DDoubleP has a great analysis of how ‘apolitical’ technocratic approaches to poverty policy effectively prevent discussion of the systemic causes behind poverty. This comes full-circle when politically-controversial but technically-effective tools for mitigating poverty are kept out of this ‘apolitical’ discourse. For example, even though no-strings-attached cash aid to poor parents is empirically one of the best ways to help poor kids succeed, the inherently political (or politicized, if you like) idea of giving money to poor people without bureaucratic oversight is too controversial to gain traction with policy makers.
- RT @SCC_Insight: Budget and economic forecast: tapping on the brakes @SeattleCouncil sccinsight.com/2017/04/24/bud… https://t.co/4UrPznsHOX 6 hours ago
- Cops Must Give Lawyers to Kids Before Questioning Them, County Council Orders Unanimously - seattleweekly.com/news/cops-must… 6 hours ago
- RT @ggreenwald: Nothing upsets the anti-Muslim obsessives more than this indisputable fact theintercept.com/2015/06/24/gre… twitter.com/CatoInstitute/… 8 hours ago
- Prosecutors Charge Red Square Shooter Who Went to Milo Yiannopoulos Protest Looking For a Fight seattleweekly.com/news/elizabeth… 8 hours ago
- RT @ericacbarnett: Surgeon general Vivek Murthy, whose report on addiction could have been a blueprint for sensible drug policy, fired: htt… 14 hours ago
© Casey Jaywork, 2015.
All rights reserved.
Excerpts from this blog may be used without prior permission from its author, provided that full and clear credit is given (including a link to the original content).
Opinions expressed on this blog reflect my own views, not the stance of any institution with which I may be affiliated.