DDoubleP has a great analysis of how ‘apolitical’ technocratic approaches to poverty policy effectively prevent discussion of the systemic causes behind poverty. This comes full-circle when politically-controversial but technically-effective tools for mitigating poverty are kept out of this ‘apolitical’ discourse. For example, even though no-strings-attached cash aid to poor parents is empirically one of the best ways to help poor kids succeed, the inherently political (or politicized, if you like) idea of giving money to poor people without bureaucratic oversight is too controversial to gain traction with policy makers.
- Who are the antifa? wapo.st/2uOh2oW?tid=ss… 1 hour ago
- RT @Harpers: "It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game [to] speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi." https://t.co/WmJm7Vx… 1 hour ago
- RT @nke_ise: If you have ever had a problem grasping the importance of diversity in tech and its impact on society, watch this video https:… 2 hours ago
- The Kent City Council Bans Safe Drug Sites, but Allows Room for Reversal - seattleweekly.com/news/the-kent-… 4 hours ago
- There’s Lots to Love About Mike O’Brien’s RV Ordinance - seattleweekly.com/news/theres-lo… 5 hours ago
© Casey Jaywork, 2015.
All rights reserved.
Excerpts from this blog may be used without prior permission from its author, provided that full and clear credit is given (including a link to the original content).
Opinions expressed on this blog reflect my own views, not the stance of any institution with which I may be affiliated.