DDoubleP has a great analysis of how ‘apolitical’ technocratic approaches to poverty policy effectively prevent discussion of the systemic causes behind poverty. This comes full-circle when politically-controversial but technically-effective tools for mitigating poverty are kept out of this ‘apolitical’ discourse. For example, even though no-strings-attached cash aid to poor parents is empirically one of the best ways to help poor kids succeed, the inherently political (or politicized, if you like) idea of giving money to poor people without bureaucratic oversight is too controversial to gain traction with policy makers.
- RT @bykenarmstrong: A "four-decades-long failed experiment," prosecutor Dan Satterberg calls the death penalty, saying Washington's law "is… 19 hours ago
- RT @jseattle: Now that’s a crowd #seawomensmarch https://t.co/y9eZqG9ild 2 days ago
- RT @Olystand: Olympia Stand 3.0? When will it happen? They are still shipping fracking proppants out of the Port of Olympia. Are you ready… 2 days ago
- RT @HayatNorimine: Can ICE come to the Women’s March? A quick guide to sensitive locations and how advocates protect undocumented immigrant… 2 days ago
- RT @ajplus: BREAKING: Democrats in Congress blocked passage of a last-minute spending bill to keep the government open. At midnight EST the… 2 days ago
© Casey Jaywork, 2015.
All rights reserved.
Excerpts from this blog may be used without prior permission from its author, provided that full and clear credit is given (including a link to the original content).
Opinions expressed on this blog reflect my own views, not the stance of any institution with which I may be affiliated.